DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7o1 Ss. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
HD
Docket No: NR5874-14
12 March 2015
for correction of your naval
This is in reference to your application
rile 10 of the United States
record pursuant to the provisions of ti
code, section 1552.
1 of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
considered your application on
or and injustice were reviewed
BR three-member pane
sitting in executive session,
12 March 2015. your allegations of err
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. in addition, the Boarc considered the
advisory opinion furnisned by the Nevy Personnel Command dated
2 October 2014 with enclosure, @ copy o- which is azvvached.
tious sonsideration of the entire record,
dence submitted was insufficient to
bable material error or injustice. in
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the advisory
opinion, noting that you did not provide a copy of the version of
the contested evaluation that you say showed you marked “early
" Beeordingly, your application has been denied. The
£ the members of the panel will be furnished upon
Biter careful and conscien
the Board found that the evi
establish the existence of pro
promote.’
names and votes o
request.
ted that the circumstances of your case are such that
be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
submission of new evidence within one
New evidence is evidence
ing its decision
It is regret
favorable action cannot
reconsider its decision upon
year from the date
not previously cons1
in this case. In this regard, it is impo
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence
of probable material error or injustice. :
Sincerely, >
Tol.
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2338 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2015. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 16 July and 4 December 2014, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5482 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6493 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6486 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8095 14
Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2015. New evidence igs evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6382 14
COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5949 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive ‘session, considered your application on 19 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8780 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket 26 Mar 1 N NR8780-14 tio cea: This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. NR&780-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2990 14
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4263 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by NPC dated 26 September 2014 with enclosure and 17 October 2014, copies of which are attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.